Now all who believed were together, and had all things in common. (Acts 2.44)
Many wonder
why I am not a supporter of government “doing the work of the Church” by
feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, giving shelter to the homeless. As much
as I teach the importance of these Christian traits, many are confused as to
why I do NOT support the government being involved in these good works. The
answer rests in the results of Communism as it has been expressed on the world
scene in the 20th Century.
Within the
Church for more than 2000 years, however, communism has been practiced with
great success. Have you ever wondered HOW the Church has been successful with
communism while governments have not been successful? The answer is freedom.
The Church has NEVER forced her believers to live “in common” but allowed love
to govern the hearts of believers. It was an act of love and unity that created
the WILLING sharing of resources in the ancient Church.
Now the multitude of those who believed were of one heart and one soul; neither did anyone say that any of the things he possessed was his own, but they had all things in common. (Acts 4.32)
To this day,
communism is thriving within the Church through holy monasticism. Men and women
VOLUNTARILY join monastic communities and live in common with each other.
(Monasteries are not coed; men live in male monasteries and women in women
monasteries.) In fact, joining a monastery is neither taken lightly, nor should
it be a rash decision. Potential monastics are required to spend a period of
time (varies from place to place) to ensure the decision is genuine and the way
of life freely chosen. Then following a period of “testing” the candidate is
eventually allowed to join the monastery. This process is necessary to ensure
the freedom of every human being is preserved as a sacred gift of God.
When
government is involved in communism, or any form of shared resources, freedom
must be preserved at all costs. When, as was the case in Russia in the last
century, resources are taken from one and given to another by force, the system
ceases to become a response of love and unity, and becomes a system of resentment
and separation. Eventually the system collapses, not because people are
incapable of loving, but because
ultimately ever human being strives to be free.
So when I am
faced with whether or not the government should get involved in the “work of
the Church”, the answer isn’t as simple as yes or no. The answer depends upon
the hearts of those participating. There have been and will be times when the
sharing of resources is universally and freely embraced. At those times, the
answer might be yes. If however, the sharing of resources becomes a matter of
force and lacks the free participation of those involved, I am less inclined to
support such work.
Of course,
this does not address the fact that I believe STRONGLY that the work of the
Church is the WORK OF THE CHURCH and should not be delegated to the government,
as the government by design does not work from the perspective of Christian
love, but democratic compromise. The real answer, from my point of view, is THE
CHURCH needs to get back to what it does best…..living as a community of love.
1 comment:
Amen
Post a Comment